Wood Based Panels International
RSS












*Particleboard plant for VMG Industries *Swedspan celebrates investment in Poland *International convention in Geneva *Garnica officially opens plywood factory *Norbord buoyed by OSB demand *Patented green veneer moisture measuring system *Congratulations to Heiner Wemhoener *Ghana’s wood products exports rises 4.3% *Malaysia mixes optimism with caution *IWPA approves new veneer standard *Weyerhaeuser to reopen Hudson Bay mill *Formica debuts VIVIX exterior panels *Sumitomo Forestry establishes Vietnamese particleboard subsidiary *Safwood starts OSB production in Komi Republic *Uniboard to close Fostoria lamination plant *Shear panel gets compliance verification *European panels symposium finalised *iLevel partners with CMPC *Tolko takes downtime at plywood operation *Atcon Plywood receiver hopeful of offers *GP completes acquisition of OSB mills in Canada and US *TFT announces production of legally verified Chinese plywood *The Dresden Resolution – Using Wood Responsibly *New publications on structural plywood and glulam standards *Plywood alternative, being trialled in UK *Biomass plants threaten UK wood panel industry, campaign says *IWPA welcomes US formaldehyde emissions standard legislation *VHI celebrates 90 years *Floraplac launches Chinese-built fibreboard line *Don't miss IPPS Master Class *Changes to Pfleiderer's supervisory board *Clarion Survey Germany acquires Survey Turkey *New director of marketing at Dieffenbacher *Successes and award for Schattdecor *New sales manager for Flakreboard *Mobile laser die cutting lab *UPM nursery celebrates 30 years *Three Interprint decors win award *UPM plans Finnish biofuels plant *ZOW 2010 in Italy is cancelled *DSM complete sale with name change for DSM Melamine *Wood products Vancouver conference *Appeal to change Boiler MACT rule *TurboSonic gets clean air order for US$900,000 *Targeting Rugby World Cup 2011 *Siempelkamp makes big breakthrough *LP plant earns safety award *Arauco back on track with new build *Evergreen to expand operations in next two years *Italian woodworking machinery showing good recovery *North American I-joist production boost *BASF product finder contains 800 product lines *Uniboard's Sayabec mill now certified *LP shows good sales figures *Biomass surpasses oil *Egger obtains environmental permit for €40m glue plant
Technically Speaking
I am a great believer in using wood in construction; both for the structural components and internal fittings.
Published:  04 December, 2009

Dr Mark Irle

When discussing timber construction, the question of fire resistance often enters the conversation. In many ways, wood is an excellent material in a fire situation because its properties are predictable and, most importantly, it does not melt as metal beams are prone to do. Wood does burn and so in certain situations it cannot be used unless it is treated and/or protected in some way.
Practically every country in the world has developed a set of regulations concerning fire protection and the use of materials in construction. Invariably there are differences in test methods and classification systems, so a construction product made and used in one country cannot automatically be used in another unless there is some form of reciprocal agreement over fire regulations.
The European Commission recognised that national fire regulations inadvertently created trade barriers within the European Union and therefore developed a harmonised system of classification, testing and requirements of products in given situations.
Classification using test data from reaction to fire tests outlines the criteria and specifies the test methods used to classify products.
The classification system contains six classes (A1, A2, B, C, D and E), where A1 is the most fire-resistant. There is a second set of classes – A1fl through to Efl – for flooring products. The two sets are very similar in terms of criteria, however.
In addition, information must be given about smoke production for all products and the potential to form flaming droplets or particles for non-flooring products that are in classes A2 through to E. The smoke-forming grades are denoted s1 or s2 for all end-uses, where products in s1 produce the least smoke, plus there is a third category, s3, for non-flooring products.
For flaming droplets the categories are d0, d1 or d3, where d0 indicates that no flaming particles are formed within the parameters of the test.
This all sounds very complicated, but, for wood based panels it is not because plywood, OSB, particleboard and MDF all have the same EU fire class of Dfl-s1 for flooring products and D-s2,d0 for all other uses. It is a shame that the smoke categories are different, because I think it adds complication to a complex system. It is caused by the fact that there are only two smoke categories for flooring products.
The fire ratings of a panel can be improved by incorporating fire retardant chemicals during its manufacture, or applying them subsequently. If the CE mark of a panel indicates that its fire rating is better than D, then it must either have been treated in some way or is a cement-bonded particleboard, which has a classification of B-s1,d0.