Wood Based Panels International
E-mail Updates
RSS












*Italian woodworking machinery shows powerful rebound *China's wood deficit creates opportunities *China timber and wood products show *Chris Sutton appointed to TTA *Flakeboard hires Darrell Keeling *ZOW Germany is looking good *Congress weighs in against EPA rule *IPPS Master Class 2010 *Egger installs Steinemann sander *From particleboard plants to combi-plants *New centre for wood based composite materials *Siempelkamp expertise for Vietnamese joint venture *Strong growth from Coveright *Suvi Anttila joins Indufor *Ligna and Interzum collaborate *German wood machinery sales recover *Industry spectrum at APA meeting *Australian distributor for Steinemann *Egger resumes growth strategy after 33% profits rise *Boise instals US$11m plywood dryer *Brazilian plywood exports rise *UPM stages strong recovery *VRG orders largest MDF plant in Asia *LP's sales up 67% in Q2 *Canfor shows improved results *American Wood Council becomes independent *Duty-free plywood quota exhausted *Atcon Plywood receiver hopeful of offers *OSB plant fire damage runs into six figures *Biesse reports 61% order increase *Improved panel demand boosts Plum Creek *Interzum bookings strong *Interprint acquires 100% of Coveright Russia *Norbord in final phase of £25m Cowie investment *Australasia's role in forest industry *US MDF imports run counter to trends *Southern US to become major biomass exporter *Particleboard plant for VMG Industries *Swedspan celebrates investment in Poland *International convention in Geneva *Garnica officially opens plywood factory *Norbord buoyed by OSB demand *Patented green veneer moisture measuring system
A quality surface or 'just laminate'?
Published:  13 October, 2006
Public perception is everything. Is the industry producing a high-quality decorative paper based surface to compete on equal terms with solid wood, veneer or stone, or is it producing 'just laminate'?
"I can't afford 'the real thing', so I will have 'just laminate' on my kitchen worktops," says Mr or Mrs homeowner. This issue was raised with some enthusiasm by chairman Lee Miller at the TAPPI Decorative and Industrial Laminates Symposium in Atlanta in August (full report starts on p44).
He wants the industry to raise the profile of laminates generically. He said the industry had marketed to the specifiers and not educated the public. He talked of a 'Decorative Surfaces Institute' to raise the industry's own image to be the "premier decorative product", funded by the industry for the benefit of the industry. His other concern was with rogue contractors who use a lower grade of laminate than that specified. For instance, he highlighted the potential use of non fire retardant laminate where such a grade was demanded. As the grade is stamped on the back face of the laminate, how would the client know? Another example is the use of unbacked laminate worktops above dishwashers, where heat and humidity levels lead to warping of the worktop. The result of these misuses is not, of course, one instance of fire damage, or one worktop failure. The real result is damage to the image of decorative laminate in total. Mr Miller suggested certification of contractors as one answer to this problem. Decorative laminate technology has developed so dramatically that it takes close examination to tell a wood-grain or stone-effect laminate (particularly if it is embossed-in-register) from real wood or stone. It is no longer 'just a laminate' but a high-quality product in its own right - available in unique and stunning designs as well as copies of natural materials - which has resulted from extensive research and development and should be appreciated as a surfacing choice in its own right, not as a 'cheap' alternative. Does this all sound a little familiar to panel manufacturers too? If a non moisture-resistant panel is used in the wrong place. or a panel is subjected to bad site practice, failure can result and that will reflect badly on wood based panels in general. Too often the supplier of a panel has not enquired as to its end-use to ensure the correct product is being supplied. Generic promotion of all products, including the value-added ones, and of their correct application, would obviously benefit the whole industry and improve that public perception. But who is going to do it?